“There are only two people who can tell you the truth about yourself – an enemy who has lost his temper and a friend who loves you dearly.”—Antisthenes
Shut up and listen. That's the first and best thing you can do for yourself when sitting down to hear someone's critique of your writing. You've given them your work to see what they think, so give them free rein to tell you.
There is nothing gained by defending
your work against someone who is trying to help you. Every critique
is a learning experience, a chance to better understand your writing,
flaws and successes alike. Treat it as such.
If you have specific questions for your
reader, write them down ahead of time and wait until you are well
into what should be a one-sided conversation before you bring them
up. Don't ask your reader to watch for anything before they've read
your work. You don't want to influence their reading. They
have to come to your writing fresh, just as they would anything off
the shelf. Say as little as possible to them about what you've
written. It is for them to tell you what you have done.
With that in mind, keep your
questions open ended. First ask, what did you think of this
character, before
specifying, did you find them funny.
The most of what you should say during the critique is why, why
not, and can you tell
me more about that.
Not everyone offering you a critique is
a master at the craft. Even editors and writers with endless
bestsellers and lavishly awarded works can be uncertain what needs to
change in a given draft, or how. The best readers will critique your
work with an eye for helping you achieve your vision instead of
manipulating it into something they want to see. If your reader does
not appear to make an effort to understand your intent, consider the
value of their advice accordingly, but do not disregard their
reactions.
Your reader's reactions to your work is
the single most important feedback you can ask for, whether or
not they have any interesting suggestions. Faults may not be where a
reader thinks they are, but that does not mean nothing is wrong.
Sometimes a moment would otherwise work if it were better supported
earlier in the story. But if your reader was confused, or put off,
or bored, it falls to you to discern why that might be and what you
can do about it. Every comment is a question you have to answer
to in your writing. If you don't have good answers, you have
work to do.
There is such a thing as bad advice.
Listening to everybody is as mindless as listening to nobody.
What you do with your work is up to you, but the better you know your
work, the easier it will be to tell the good advice from the bad.
As a last word on intent, what you
first wanted from your writing is not always what needs to happen for
it to be the best it can be. Despite what your intentions may have
been, not only may your execution have been poor, but the intentions
themselves may lack merit. What is most interesting about your work
is not always what you assumed. Sometimes you have to do what is
right for the story, not your ego.
These are terrific suggestions. I actually wrote a post suggesting that honest criticism of your work is the make-or-break difference between success and failure - particularly for writers who intend to self-publish. Thanks for your insights - particularly about setting aside ego to improve the story.
ReplyDeletegood points.
ReplyDelete